top of page

Aren't we all descended from kings...?

Travellers in Ireland in the 18th and 19th centuries often noted that everyone claimed descent from a long line of kings or chieftains, and even the humblest cabin dwellers could recite lengthy genealogies tracing their ancestry back many generations - even to Adam in some cases. 

​

The genealogy industry earns its profits from our desire to connect with a distant past, and to invest our existence with some greater meaning and significance than the modern world  can provide. It will readily (and not entirely untruthfully) declare to its customers via a DNA test that they are 60% the descendants of Irish kings, 15% Viking raiders and 2% Saracen warriors. It will sell them family crests and clan tartans of dubious authenticity, and even provide them with the unique pattern to ‘knit your own Boyle family Aran sweater’. Here it is, should you want to have one.

​

Whether all those who now bear the surname Boyle are actually descended from the Ó Baoighill sept is debatable.  Although Ireland was among the first European countries to regularise the use of surnames, this may only have applied to the aristocratic elite and their collateral lineages.  Traditional Gaelic society was exclusive and hierarchical. The majority of the population in a Gaelic lordship were landless workers who sold their labour to the landholding classes in return for a proportion of the agricultural goods they produced. They counted for little as far as the elite were concerned, and up to the end of the Gaelic period (about 1700) they may not have needed, or used, hereditary surnames. 

 

Some of these may have been simply the poorer members of the sept who, over the generations, had lost the right to hold land. Others may have migrated from a different lordship, either voluntarily (since there is some evidence for a degree of labour mobility) or otherwise, seized in raids as slaves or hostages[Farrell, G. (2017) pp 165-166].  As the use of surnames became more common, they may simply have taken, or been given, the name of their overlord, much as African-American slaves in the Deep South adopted the names of the plantation owners.

​

Nevertheless, it is probably fair to say that, either through blood or service, since we now bear the name, we are connected through the paternal line to these people who lived up to a millennium ago. 

 

download.jpeg

If one could trace every line of one’s ancestry back for a thousand years, it would turn out that everyone who was alive then (within a certain wide geographical zone) was an ancestor. A thousand years is about forty generations; counting the number of ancestors at each generation (two parents, four grandparents, eight great-grandparents etc) ends up with over a trillion 40th generation ancestors! [For the mathematically-minded, 2 to the power of  40 = 1,099,511,627,776]

 

Given that there were no more than two million people in Ireland then [Hannah & McLaughlin, 2019; Silicon Republic 2019], and probably many fewer, there is an awful lot of shared ancestry. We are descended from the same fairly small number of people many times over.  Instead of drawing an ever-branching tree of ancestors, it is probably more useful to think of a dense and complex network that ties everyone living now to those who lived in the past, and that we all share each others’ bloodlines and DNA.   https://humphrysfamilytree.com/ca.irishtimes.html

​

 

From the point of view of genetics and demography it makes no sense to point to a specific individual in the distant past and say “that is our ancestor”, when we are also descended from just about everybody else who was living at that time.

 

So if someone tells you he’s descended from the 8th century Emperor Charlemagne, or 10th century Brian Boru, High King of Ireland you can greet him as a long-lost cousin, saying “well, so am I, but both of us are descended from slaves as well as kings”.

 

That said, there’s no way we can trace every single line of descent, and there’s a certain logic in focussing on something consistent such as a shared surname and a sense of common identity.

​

Concentrating on one line of descent can illuminate the impact of great historical events on the individuals affected and bring us to a deeper understanding of the trials and triumphs of those who went before us, and who made us who we are.

​

​

Charlemagne by Albrecht Dürer, German National Museum, Nürnberg

© 2021 by My Site. All Rights Reserved.

bottom of page